A physicist friend once explained
that a brilliant proof was both functional and beautiful. We all see the world through our own maps and patterns, and maths for me is an alien language - this is about trying to feel another aesthetic.
And Some Interesting
And some interesting pictures appeared. They were shapely and shimmering, light and majestic, small and filigree, yet with unsayable grandeur.
They were beautiful code.
To the uninitiated, they were just numbers,
arranged in sequences, looking fairly random. Some were long, extending to
several pages, others were short – groups of five, six, seven – and ranked in
ways that suggested a larger scheme that couldn't be discerned.
But to us, they were ineffably lovely. They
flocked and grouped in weird ways. They resonated with each other, picking up
each others' themes, echoing them in part, suggesting and avoiding them and
creating their presence in their absence. They teased and blatantly blurted.
They held such meaning in their fragile shapes – the small shapes of the digits,
the larger ones of groups, the bigger hidden shape that underpinned the whole
work, and could only be perceived with a mental gesture of such scope that it
hurt.
And those meanings are invisible to almost everyone we meet. How to
talk? How to share that awe?
© 2007 Jules Horne
31/10/2007
Ann Jefferson
Modern Literary Theory, 1982
p 91
Seems there aren't many references to fat French quails on the internet...
